Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Solend and Bancor Drama: Did These DAOs Violate the Ethos of Crypto?

Solend and Bancor Drama: Did These DAOs Violate the Ethos of Crypto?

Episode 366 Published 3 years, 6 months ago
Description

Derek Hsue, cofounder at Reverie, discusses the recent controversial decisions by Solend DAO and Bancor, the importance of establishing processes for black swan events, and whether decentralized governance truly exists. Show highlights:

  • what situation prompted Solend to feel it was in jeopardy
  • what Solend DAO’s response was to that situation
  • why Derek views it as “the nuclear option”
  • why the proposal sparked an outcry from the crypto community
  • whether this issue could have been prevented or managed differently if the protocol was built on a blockchain other than Solana
  • why, a day later, the DAO reversed its first decision to take over the whale’s account
  • whether Derek thinks the DAO made the right decision to not take over the whale’s account
  • what is Impermanent Loss Protection, a feature offered by Bancor
  • why Bancor decided to pause Impermanent Loss Protection
  • whether Celsius and 3AC had anything to do with Bancor’s problem
  • how Bancor’s decision was made unilaterally
  • how DAOs should deal with black swan events

 

 

Thank you to our sponsors!

 

Crypto.com: https://crypto.onelink.me/J9Lg/unconfirmedcardearnfeb2021 

Ava Labs: https://www.avax.network/

 

 

EPISODE LINKS

 

Derek

 

Reverie

 

Solend DAO Situation

 

Bancor Pausing Impermanent Loss Protection

 

DAO Governance issues:

<
Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us