Episode Details
Back to Episodes
"Nineteen Acts of Injustice By the Washington National Guard: Revealing the Judge Advocate General's Unethical and Deceitful Practices -Act 5
Description
Episode Summary — "Nineteen Acts of Injustice: Act 5 — JAG's Unethical and Deceitful Practices"
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive." Host Gary opens Act 5 of his ongoing series with this fitting Sir Walter Scott quote, setting the stage for an episode that exposes how the Washington National Guard's Judge Advocate General (JAG) office orchestrated a malicious prosecution — and how their own deceptions progressively trapped them.
The Setup (1998): At the 168th Aviation Battalion at Fort Lewis, Brett Dockery and Major Robin Davis hatched a scheme to prosecute an innocent female soldier in retaliation for her complaints. The core tactic: take evidence of a crime committed by one soldier, attribute it to another, and let the actual offender go free.
The Supply Room Trap: The soldier was locked out of her own supply room during a change-of-command inventory. Sergeant First Class Rutchy then conducted the audit and reported over $150,000 in missing equipment — a wildly inflated figure that formed the basis of the initial charges. Once the soldier was allowed back in and properly reconciled her hand receipts — following all regulations — the actual shortfall was a mere $198 in expendable miscellaneous items.
The Fabricated Replacement Charges: When the original charges collapsed under the weight of that discrepancy, JAG pivoted to a new charge: making a false official statement. But the "false statement" was actually a routine, regulation-compliant date adjustment made by a warehouse NCO who legally accepted exchanged equipment. That sergeant's sworn statement — admitting he acted alone and within regulation — was deliberately kept out of the charging packet.
The Complicity Chain:
- Captain Gregory Goodell (defense counsel) sat idle for eight months, offering no legal advice beyond "suck it up" — a textbook case of ineffective assistance of counsel.
- Major Donald Bennett (prosecutor) knowingly suppressed exculpatory evidence.
- Major Robin Davis (JAG) failed to investigate the legal merits before pressing charges.
- Major Shaw kept his name off all documentation, ensuring clean hands.
Bennett quietly removed himself as prosecutor once the new charges were filed — a move Gary reads as self-preservation, not accident.
The "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" Argument: Gary argues that the soldier's rights were violated from the start — she was never read her rights before questioning. Under established legal doctrine, everything flowing from that violation, including the warehouse evidence, should be inadmissible. Yet JAG pressed forward anyway, relying on the Feres doctrine — the legal shield that prevents service members from successfully holding the military accountable in civilian courts — to operate without real oversight.
The Broader Warning: Gary pulls back to the bigger picture: the military justice system, he argues, is a facade. Not just in the Washington National Guard, but across every branch. Evidence that helps the accused is hidden; evidence against them is embellished or falsified. The Feres doctrine ensures that even if a soldier fights all the way to the Supreme Court, the outcome is predetermined. It's a lose-lose for anyone in uniform — and the episode serves as an explicit warning to anyone considering enlistment to understand what they're really signing up for.
Cliffhanger: As September arrives, a pivotal shift occurs — one the National Guard never saw coming. Next episode: Gregory Goodell gets the boot.