Episode Details

Would you recognise the better investment if it were right in front of you?

Imagine you have $100,000 to invest for ten years. You're offered two hypothetical outcomes: a 50% return upfront, with no growth after that, or 8% a year for the full ten years. Which would you choose?

And how much money could your choice leave on the table?

You want your investments to give you more freedom and security. But when you're deciding how to get there, the numbers that grab your attention can make the choice harder than it looks.

In this Financial Autonomy Essentials episode, Paul puts those two options to the test and explores what the result means for the way you invest. If you've been wondering whether to stick with your approach or chase something more ambitious, this comparison gives you a reason to pause.

Inside this episode:

• How your first instinct stacks up against the numbers

• What you could be overlooking when comparing investment returns

• Why the temptation to get ahead faster deserves a closer look

Choose your answer, then press play. The difference could be bigger than you think.

Want personalised investment advice?: Book your appointment here.

In your 30s or 40s and wondering whether to invest, pay down your mortgage or boost your super? Wealth Builder helps you work out what to prioritise and gives you a financial plan. Learn more here.