Episode Details

Back to Episodes
ICYMI - Who Answers When an AI Tool Causes Harm?

ICYMI - Who Answers When an AI Tool Causes Harm?

Season 3 Episode 39 Published 1 week, 6 days ago
Description

AI accountability sounds simple when you compare a website to a wall covered in graffiti. Greg Fish tests that comparison so you can see where it holds, and where it changes when the product is a tool capable of acting.

Rules for user posts face a difficult question: who decides what must come down? Greg warns that giving governments broad power over that decision could also suppress legitimate speech. Does the same concern apply when a company chooses to release an AI tool?

Automated cyber misuse could put new pressure on security systems. Stronger safeguards have a cost, while companies have reasons to keep growing. Can they decide alone how much protection is enough when someone else may have to deal with the consequences?

Topics: AI accountability, user posts, Section 230, cyber security, safeguards

GUEST: Greg Fish | cyberpunksurvivalguide.com

Originally aired on 2026-09-22

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us