Episode Details
Back to EpisodesTrump goes OFF THE RAILS in ludicrous social media posting spree
Description
At 9:58 in the morning, Donald Trump began a nearly ten-hour posting spree about artificial intelligence. Seven posts, one recurring word: “HOAX.” He claimed the only guardrail AI needs is a “STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT,” then attacked the people asking for safeguards and called into a room of tech leaders to insist the warnings were a hoax because AI makes people wealthy. I am not calling for an AI ban. I am calling for enforceable rules, a Congress willing to act, and a president who takes public safety seriously. Meanwhile, ProPublica’s reporting about a Russian oligarch helping pay for Don Jr.’s wedding raised questions that Senator Chris Murphy demanded Republicans answer.
Based on the events of Sep 14, 2026
The Breakdown:
- Trump’s seven AI-focused posts, from his morning claim to be the only guardrail needed to his final evening attack
- His warnings about killing the “Golden Goose” and his complaints about data-center permitting
- The shift from dismissing AI concerns to portraying scientists and executives raising them as hostile targets
- His All-In Summit call with Jensen Huang onstage, declaring the warnings a hoax and emphasizing wealth
- China’s response to calls for a slowdown and the danger of each government using the other to reject safeguards
- Why the accelerating competition reminds me of an arms race without adequate controls
- The memory of Trump’s pandemic response and the danger of replacing expertise with declarations of personal genius
- AI’s implications for deepfakes, disinformation, elections, surveillance, and young people
- Data centers’ energy and water demands and the impact on nearby communities
- Why responsible AI use and national security still require enforceable legislative guardrails
- The calls for slower development and safety measures attributed to Dario Amodei and Sam Altman
- Why uncertainty about industry motives does not erase the need for oversight, and the comparison with Oppenheimer
- ProPublica’s report that Umar Kremlev helped finance Donald Trump Jr.’s Bahamas wedding
- The reported island rental, estimated $70,000 fireworks display, and the family’s explanation that the support was a gift from a friend
- Chris Murphy’s Senate-floor questions about foreign influence and the Trump family’s business interests
- Contacting Congress about AI regulation and an investigation into the reported wedding financing
- The Supreme Court leaving the block on new mail-ballot requirements in place while litigation continues—a meaningful interim win
This commentary represents my personal opinions and analysis of matters of public concern, informed by publicly available information. Any references to individuals constitute opinion and commentary protected under the First Amendment.