Episode Details

Back to Episodes

Albemarle (ALB): 86% Of The Q2 Beat Was The Lithium Price - Not Operations

Published 2 weeks, 3 days ago
Description
Albemarle Corporation (ALB) Q2 2026 — Q2 2026 (quarter ended June 30, 2026): net sales $1,743.3M, +31.1% y/y, vs a $1,606.9M bar (+8.5%). Adjusted diluted EPS $3.75 vs $3.20 (+17.2%). GAAP diluted EPS $3.52. Adjusted EBITDA $858.1M, +155%, a 49.2% margin. Energy Storage sales +$559.0M on volume +11.0% (59 to 65 kT LCE) and realized price +60.5% ($12.17 to $19.53/kg) - so ~$478M, 86%, is price. Incremental EBITDA margin 90%. FCF $638.3M. Net debt $245M, leverage 0.5x. Diluted shares 136.2M vs basic 118.0M (+15.5%). Print was AMC (8-K accepted 16:22 ET Aug 5); the stock closed $125.42 the next session, +5.54%. Albemarle reported Q2 2026 after the close on August 5 and beat both lines: net sales $1,743.3M against a $1,606.9M bar, and adjusted diluted EPS of $3.75 against $3.20. Adjusted EBITDA more than doubled to $858.1M. The stock rose 5.54% to $125.42. But Albemarle discloses what most producers do not - both volume and realized price. Energy Storage added $559.0M of sales on volume up 11.0% (59 to 65 kilotons LCE) and realized price up 60.5% ($12.17 to $19.53 per kg LCE). Decompose it: the pure price effect is $434M, volume $73M, and the cross term $44M - so roughly $478M, 86% of the increase, is the lithium price rather than operations. The incremental EBITDA margin was 90%, which runs in reverse just as hard. And the widely-assumed Ketjen angle is backwards: there is no discontinued-operations presentation, the $95.0M loss on sale sits in the six-month column with a dash in the three-month column, and the deconsolidation is a $218M HEADWIND to the y/y comparison, not a tailwind. Strip Ketjen from both years and the continuing segments grew 59%, not 31%. Meanwhile the company's own flat-$20-lithium scenario ($2.4-2.6B FY adjusted EBITDA) minus the $1,521.9M already banked in H1 implies a second half of $878M-$1,078M - down about 36% versus the first half at unchanged prices - while consensus FY revenue of $6,412M sits above the top of that entire scenario band. THE CALL: HOLD (3/5, A GOOD COMPANY THAT IS A LEVERED CLAIM ON ONE COMMODITY PRICE) — base-case value ~$112.0 vs ~$125.42 today. KEY METRICS: - CALL: HOLD 3/5, fair value ~$112 vs $125.42 (-11%). Bull $207, base $111, bear $51. Street: Hold, avg target $206.75 - which IS our bull case. - Sales $1,743.3M (+31.1%) vs $1,606.9M. Adj EPS $3.75 vs $3.20. Adj EBITDA $858.1M (+155%), 49.2% margin. FCF $638.3M. Net debt $245M, 0.5x. - But 86% of the Energy Storage gain was PRICE ($19.53 vs $12.17/kg), not volume (+11%). ALB's own $20-lithium case implies H2 EBITDA -36%. What to watch: UP: a Q3 where VOLUME rather than realized price carries the growth; H2 adjusted EBITDA beating the company's own implied ~$978M; Specialties adjusted EBITDA holding above $300M; lithium carbonate holding above $20/kg into the winter; the FY26 capex figure landing below $500M. DOWN: realized price rolling back toward the mid-teens; the Talison CGP3 ramp slipping further after the June 9 fire; CORFO commissions climbing; consensus cutting FY26 revenue back inside the $5.7-6.0B scenario band; any further half-over-half decline in Energy Storage adjusted EBITDA. Also on YouTube: @ChargedAlpha DISCLAIMER: For informational and educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Do your own research before any investment decision.
Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us