Episode Details

Episode 282 concludes our 31-week journey through the Bible difficulties of the Book of Numbers by examining the two-witness requirement in Numbers 35:30. Does this law mean that a murderer could only be convicted if two people actually witnessed the crime? If so, wouldn't most murderers simply go free?

Lance Smith explores the skeptical objection, examines the Hebrew word ʿēd ("witness"), and shows that the Mosaic Law required corroborated evidence—not necessarily two literal eyewitnesses. Drawing on the work of Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, David Guzik, Precept Austin, Edward D. Andrews, and GotQuestions.org, he demonstrates that God's law was designed to protect innocent life from false accusations while still allowing justice to be carried out when guilt could be firmly established.

This episode also marks the conclusion of the Numbers series, highlighting how careful attention to language, context, and historical background often resolves passages that initially appear contradictory.

References to items discussed and/or used on this podcast may be found at the following:

buymeacoffee.com/lancesmith 

The Bible Difficulties and Answers Website

The Bible Difficulties and Answers Facebook Page

Email Address: bibledifficultiesandanswers@gmail.com 

1. Geisler, Norman L., and Thomas Howe. The Big Book of Bible Difficulties. Baker Books, 1992. Available at: https://a.co/d/7shn4hI 
2. “Why are two or three witnesses needed in Deuteronomy 17:6 and 19:15?” GotQuestions.org. https://www.gotquestions.org/two-or-three-witnesses.html
3. Andrews, Edward D. “Witnesses in the Wilderness: The Biblical Law of Evidence and the Case of Unseen Transgression.” Christian Publishing House, November 2, 2023. https://christianpublishinghouse.co/2023/11/02/witnesses-in-the-wilderness-the-biblical-law-of-evidence-and-the-case-of-unseen-transgression/
4. Guzik, David. Enduring Word Commentary on Numbers 35. https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/numbers-35/
5. Precept Austin. Numbers 35 Commentary. https://www.preceptaustin.org/numbers-35-commentary