Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Probably Provenance? You Can’t Just Slap a Sticker on It

Probably Provenance? You Can’t Just Slap a Sticker on It

Published 1 week, 1 day ago
Description

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/probably-provenance-you-cant-just-slap-a-sticker-on-it.
C2PA treats provenance like a sticker. This essay argues AI agents need locally held, tamper-evident logs that anyone can verify.
Check more stories related to cybersecurity at: https://hackernoon.com/c/cybersecurity. You can also check exclusive content about #data-privacy-compliance, #blockchain-data-provenance, #data-provenance-in-ai-models, #c2pa, #provenance-trust-models, #certificate-transparency, #digital-content-provenance, #c2pa-limitations, and more.

This story was written by: @paulkrause. Learn more about this writer by checking @paulkrause's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.

The article argues that C2PA’s content-bound manifests can be separated from assets during ordinary transformations and that its official trust model still depends on approved certificate authorities. It proposes locally held, append-only and tamper-evident system logs as a stronger model for recording autonomous-agent actions. C2PA does support both embedded and externally stored manifests, as well as soft bindings intended to reconnect altered assets with provenance records.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us