Episode Details
Back to Episodes
39 - Pallet of Pimento
Description
NO ID Episode 39 - Pallet of Pimento
This episode is dedicated to the one and only John C. Dvorak.
Executive Producers:
Dan of the Dead
Jack Cramer
Measles panic, “safe and effective” messaging, Flock cameras, and the strange legal consequences of destroying government surveillance equipment. Plus, why more laws don't necessarily make you safer, the Moscow murder case and Kohberger's guilty plea, a brief tour of prison etiquette, the grand opening of the Flying Pickle, and Idaho's supposedly devastating $154 million in budget cuts.
Timestamps:
(00:02:50) The latest measles scare
(00:04:00) Raw numbers, percentages, and “record-breaking” cases
(00:06:35) Measles, pandemic exercises, and “safe and effective”
(00:13:00) The propaganda phrase machine
(00:16:20) Flock cameras and the surveillance state
(00:21:00) Post Falls Mayor Randy Westlund takes a position on Flock
(00:25:30) Conservatives, cops, and how much surveillance is acceptable
(00:33:00) Flock Safety, Idaho law, and the right to privacy
(00:38:20) Does surveillance actually equal safety?
(00:45:00) Pimento spam and the value-for-value model
(00:50:00) Executive producers and the Flock debate
(00:58:25) The Moscow murders and Kohberger's guilty plea
(01:03:00) Hair Plug Paul's guide to prison
(01:10:00) What actually happens after you plead guilty
(01:15:55) The Flying Pickle comes to Post Falls
(01:21:10) Idaho's $5.7 billion tax haul and the “cuts are killing people” narrative
NO ID is Idaho's mainstream media deconstruction podcast, covering politics, government, local media, and the stories behind the stories shaping the Inland Northwest.
If you find value in our show, return some value: Share it with someone, leave a rating or review, or become an executive producer.
Connect with NO ID:
Submit stories, tips, clips, articles, boots-on-the-ground reports, or any other contributions to noidpod@gmail.com.
Disclaimer: Natural law exists whether you acknowledge it, reject it, or legislate against it. It is inherent and does not depend on your or anybody else's agreement with it.