Episode Details

Examines the Supreme Court's controversial rulings on birthright citizenship and mail-in ballots, arguing that the decisions expose a growing divide between constitutional originalism and judicial institutionalism. Explores what these rulings could mean for future Supreme Court nominations, election integrity, the Article V movement, and the broader conservative effort to reshape America's constitutional future.

–

Go to https://offer.sierramadreresearch.com/dr-steve-turley-pws  to get your Pure Water Straw today.

*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.* 

Don’t stand alone. Join the Courageous Patriot Club below. https://turley.pub/Club-0629

Highlights:

• "Supreme Court rulings on birthright citizenship and mail-in ballots”
• "The difference between constitutional originalism and judicial institutionalism"
• "Why future Supreme Court nominations could shape the nation's legal direction"
• "The Article V constitutional amendment process, the SAVE Act, and election integrity efforts" 

–

Thanks for tuning in! Loved the episode? Subscribe and leave a review to help us keep these conversations going. 

Follow me on X: https://x.com/DrTurleyTalks

Want more insight like this? Sign up for Patriot Alerts—my FREE daily newsletter and weekly wrap-up: https://turley.pub/AlertPatriot

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright  Law.