Episode Details

In this post I’ll sketch out an informal model of intelligent agents as webs of beliefs (or belief webs for short). The belief webs framework pulls together ideas from active inference, agent foundations and machine learning. In doing so it aims to unify beliefs, goals and actions as three facets of a single phenomenon. Few of these ideas are original to me, but I haven't seen anyone tie them together in a single place before. I've flagged the frameworks I'm drawing from throughout the post.

Beliefs are held together by local consistency constraints

The core premise of belief webs is that an agent's beliefs are typically locally consistent with nearby beliefs but not necessarily globally consistent with all its other beliefs (except, perhaps, in the limit of ideal rationality). This poses a problem for frameworks which describe agents in terms of a single probability distribution (as causal graphs, Solomonoff induction, and active inference do).

Two frameworks which are capable of handling global inconsistency are Richardson's probabilistic dependency graphs (PDGs) and Garrabrant induction. (They focus on empirical inconsistency and logical inconsistency respectively, but I’ll abstract away from that difference for now.) We can roughly analogize the nodes in PDGs to [...]

---

Outline:

(00:40) Beliefs are held together by local consistency constraints

(03:11) Actions are beliefs

(07:27) Goals are beliefs

(14:06) Open problems for belief webs

The original text contained 6 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
June 27th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/M39Z2CvyfaxZdaxR4/agents-as-webs-of-beliefs

---

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.