Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Why Agents Are Forcing Enterprises to Finally Fix Their Dev Process

Why Agents Are Forcing Enterprises to Finally Fix Their Dev Process

Season 1 Episode 111 Published 4 months ago
Description

Enterprises are finally being forced to care about their software development lifecycle — not because anyone suddenly got disciplined, but because agents cost money and the waste is now visible. When it was humans, it was "Timmy's just lazy." Now it's a line item. 

Simon Maple sat down with Patrick Debois (the godfather of DevOps, now DevRel at Tessl), Tammuz Dubnov (co-founder and CEO of Autonomy AI), and Daniel Jones (Head of Product at re:cinq) at AI Native DevCon London for a wide-ranging panel on AI enablement — who owns it, what's breaking, and what the organisations getting it right are actually doing differently. 

What we cover: 

– Who should own agentic coding adoption inside an enterprise, and why platform teams are already filling the vacuum 

– The "Timmy's lazy" problem: why agent cost visibility is forcing process discipline that humans never got 

– Why PR-based workflows are an anti-pattern inside enterprises once you're moving at agent speed 

– The PUMP framework (Plan, merge, polish): how one team is shipping features with developers, PMs, and designers all opening PRs –

 Rethinking what a "test" is in an agentic world — and why feedback loops matter more than first-pass correctness 

– The biggest mistake enterprises are making right now: piecemeal adoption with no mandate and no shared tooling 

 🌐 Tessl: https://tessl.io 

🔔 Subscribe for weekly episodes on AI-native development 


What's your team's approach to AI enablement — central mandate or letting individuals find their own way? Drop it in the comments.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us