Episode Details

Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school.

This week, we are covering Garratt v. Dailey. The case raised important questions about intent in battery and whether a person can be liable for battery if they did not specifically intend to harm someone but knew with substantial certainty that harmful contact would occur.

Use code PASSWITHPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering.

Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli