Episode Details

Back to Episodes
We Grew Active Deposit Share From 27% to 40% — Then Growth Stalled

We Grew Active Deposit Share From 27% to 40% — Then Growth Stalled

Published 15 hours ago
Description

This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/we-grew-active-deposit-share-from-27percent-to-40percent-then-growth-stalled.
We grew CoinHold's active deposit share from 27% to 40% by routing mining rewards into deposits. Here's what worked, what stalled, and what's next.
Check more stories related to product-management at: https://hackernoon.com/c/product-management. You can also check exclusive content about #product-management, #product-growth, #user-retention, #startup-lessons, #product-led-growth, #onboarding-optimization, #crm-strategy, #fintech-product-strategy, and more.

This story was written by: @n0omik. Learn more about this writer by checking @n0omik's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.

A product post-mortem on growing CoinHold, EMCD's crypto savings product. Before any growth work, we spent ~6 months refactoring a legacy codebase that miscalculated accruals — you can't grow a deposit product on rails that break. The biggest lever was uniquely ours: auto-routing mining rewards straight into deposits, which moved active deposit share from 27% to 40% (an OKR I owned, 2x the target). A profit calculator and a full UX redesign lifted average deposit from $4,200 to $5,000. Then activation tactics hit diminishing returns. Phase two isn't more depositors — it's deeper ones: balance-based rates, recurring top-ups as a habit, and savings goals. Behavior, not rate, is the moat.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us