Episode Details
Back to Episodes
The Feed & The Thread - May 30, 2026
Season 1
Episode 139
Published 4 months, 1 week ago
Description
We explore why measuring research by shipped features instead of adopted recommendations causes budgets to bleed, drawing on Brian Utesch and Tammi Fitzwater’s Recommendation-Adoption Score to prove real value. Meanwhile, the community grapples with a hiring freeze for juniors and a debate on whether AI will replace non-technical managers, revealing that automation won’t fix leadership’s blind spots if they don’t value the work in the first place.
From The Feed
- Using RAS to Guide UX Research Resource Allocation and Strategy (Brian Utesch, Tammi Fitzwater) — Track adopted recommendations to prove research changes behavior rather than just filling roadmaps.
- Solutions journalism needs better conflict, not less of it (Kamyar Razavi) — Reporting must retain conflict and explain root causes to inform rather than dramatize crises.
- From efficiency to imagination with Josh Clark and Veronika Kindred (juliahansen) — Treat AI as a design material for adaptive interfaces instead of just speeding up workflows.
From The Thread
- Is anyone else interviewing only to find out that the role they applied for has been put on hold? (r/UXResearch) — Companies hoard talent for future quarters, pausing entry-level hiring and causing structural mismatches.
- As a UX Designer I hate doing UI work. Is this normal? (r/UXDesign) — A growing divide exists between designers who prefer conceptual thinking and those focused on pixel pushing.
- 50+ applications, 3 interviews, and a pile of “reapply in late 2026” emails. Is anyone else stuck in this loop? (r/UXDesign) — Recent graduates face a hiring pause where companies defer applications, causing them to lose professional momentum.
- Design is solving a problem. That’s all it is (r/UXDesign) — Design is distinct because it solves the right problems, not just any problems, justifying its budget.
- Nobody can stand AI anymore... (r/UXDesign) — AI strips away creative satisfaction, making designers feel like they are managing robots lacking true understanding.
- Wild prediction. Managers who are neither designer nor developer are most likely to get replaced by AI (Not other ways around) (r/UXDesign) — Leaders control budgets and goals, so they won't replace themselves with tools that don't serve their interests.
- AI is the antitheses of why I got into design. (r/UXDesign) — AI feels like the opposite of design's creative purpose, reducing the work to managing a robot without understanding.
Today's Notable Articles
- Designing for AI means designing like it’s 1999 — Patrick Neeman
-
Listen Now
Love PodBriefly?
If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.
Support Us