Episode Details

🔴 Every corporate failure leaves behind a pattern.

FFL Risk Pattern Scan provides access to a searchable library of documented corporate collapses, frauds and restructurings that can be filtered by geography, sector, collapse mechanism and fraud vector.

Compare live opportunities against historical cases using pattern matching and risk assessment tools designed for investors, lenders and deal teams.

All analysis runs locally and remains private.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://risk-pattern-scan.lovable.app/⁠⁠

A custody guarantee is unconditional in the regulatory disclosure. It is conditional in practice — conditional on the firm's internal treasury not using the segregated pool as an intraday liquidity resource, on the jurisdictional rules governing each account actually prohibiting rehypothecation, and on the firm's leverage structure not creating a scenario where house capital is exhausted before margin obligations are met. MF Global's clients received an accurate regulatory disclosure. The conditionality was not in the disclosure. It was in the treasury practices, the jurisdictional structure, and the leverage arithmetic — all of which were either disclosed or askable before October 2011. This episode builds the operational due diligence framework for custody arrangements with broker-dealers: the three questions the standard ODD questionnaire doesn't ask — intraday transfer policy, jurisdictional allocation of client funds and the specific rules in each, and the leverage stress scenario under which house capital is exhausted — and the three features of MF Global's structure that were in the public record before the collapse: the repo-to-maturity notional against firm equity in the SEC 10-Q, the Moody's downgrade trajectory and its repo market access implication, and the CFTC's own 2010–2011 examination priorities flagging intraday segregation practices as an active regulatory concern. The distinction that defines the lesson: a conditional custody guarantee and an unconditional one are operationally identical under normal conditions. The difference only appears under the specific stress scenario that MF Global created by design and triggered by accident.