Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Ending Roe Was Supposed to Reduce Abortions. It Didn’t.
Published 2 years, 5 months ago
Description
From the moment that Roe v. Wade was overturned, the question was just how much the change would reduce abortions across the United States. Now, more than a year later, the numbers are in.Margot Sanger-Katz, who writes about health care for The Upshot, explains why the results are not what anyone had expected.Guest: Margot Sanger-Katz, a domestic correspondent for The New York Times.Background reading:
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
🌎 THE STORIES THAT MATTER. EVERY SINGLE MORNING.
Join 5M+ daily listeners staying ahead of the headlines. 📈
🎧 DON'T BE THE LAST TO KNOW
Catch today's deep dive: ▶️ LISTEN NOW
Never miss a beat: 🔔 SUBSCRIBE FREE
- The first estimate of births since Dobbs found that almost a quarter of women who would have gotten abortions in states that banned it carried their pregnancies to term.
- The first full-year census of U.S. abortion providers showed significant increases in abortion in states where it’s legal.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
🌎 THE STORIES THAT MATTER. EVERY SINGLE MORNING.
Join 5M+ daily listeners staying ahead of the headlines. 📈
🎧 DON'T BE THE LAST TO KNOW
Catch today's deep dive: ▶️ LISTEN NOW
Never miss a beat: 🔔 SUBSCRIBE FREE