Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Catching 98.9 Out of 100 Deepfakes: What It Takes to Lead Hugging Face's Leaderboard
Description
This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/catching-989-out-of-100-deepfakes-what-it-takes-to-lead-hugging-faces-leaderboard.
Modulate tops Hugging Face's Speech Deepfake Leaderboard with 98.9% accuracy at $0.25/hr. Here's what voice-native architecture unlocks for fraud teams.
Check more stories related to machine-learning at: https://hackernoon.com/c/machine-learning.
You can also check exclusive content about #deepfake-detection, #voice-ai, #ai-benchmarks, #audio-deepfakes, #fraud-prevention, #deepfake-benchmarks, #huggingface, #good-company, and more.
This story was written by: @modulate. Learn more about this writer by checking @modulate's about page,
and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.
Voice deepfake losses are projected to hit $40B by 2027, a 6,566% jump from 2023. Modulate's velma-2 now ranks #1 on Hugging Face's Speech Deepfake Leaderboard with a 1.104% average EER across 14 datasets and 2M+ audio samples, catching 98.9 out of every 100 deepfakes. This post breaks down why the Hugging Face benchmark is the most credible public standard for detection, how Modulate's voice-native ELM architecture outperforms repurposed models from Hiya and Resemble AI, and why running detection at $0.25/hr (100x cheaper than competitors) lets fraud teams monitor entire calls instead of just the opening seconds where most checks stop today.