Episode Details
Back to Episodes“Contra Leicht on AI Pauses” by David Scott Krueger (formerly: capybaralet)
Description
This is going to be a nerdier article than usual. It's a response to Anton Leicht's blog post “Press Play To Continue”. I disagree with much of it and think it's not very well argued.
Going section-by-section, Leicht's claims are:
-
AI is going pretty damn well all things considered. The argument has two parts:
-
It implicitly models pausing AI as resampling from a fixed distribution of possible AI development timelines.
-
It argues the current situation is better than average, so resampling is a bad idea.
-
Specifically the arguments that things are going well are:
-
Minimal compute overhang
-
Multipolarity
-
Liberal democracies control the supply chain
-
-
-
Pausing AI isn’t and won’t be popular among centrist politicians, only among the more radical wings of both parties, and this makes it unlikely to get passed.
-
A “second best” pause is more likely, and would be worse than nothing.
-
It would be unilateral.
-
It would not cater to x-risk concerns, and thus will lack critical pieces like e.g. export controls or limits on internal deployment.
-
-
Proposals to pause AI don’t expand the Overton window in a helpful way [...]
---
Outline:
(03:29) Response to the arguments
(08:31) General reflections
---
First published:
April 14th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HofdmpSHbthzZDFZH/contra-leicht-on-ai-pauses
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.