Episode Details
Back to Episodes
What if interviews don’t just reveal what we think… but actually change it?
Description
We often assume interviews are a way of capturing what people already think. But qualitative psychology suggests something different. Interviews can be active sites of meaning-making, where thoughts are not just shared, but formed in real time.
Drawing on ideas like the double hermeneutic from Anthony Giddens and reflexive approaches to qualitative research, I reflect on what it means to ask questions that might shift how someone understands their own experience.
As an insider researcher studying online communities I belong to, this raises a deeper question: what trace does research leave behind?
This episode explores:
- Why interviews are not neutral data collection tools
- How questions can shape reflection and self-understanding
- The role of reflexivity in qualitative research
- The ethical tension between insight and influence
- What happens when someone thinks something for the first time… out loud
If you’re a researcher, writer, coach, or simply curious about how we make sense of our experiences, this episode invites you to listen a little more closely to the pauses.