Episode Details
Back to Episodes
February 3, 2000: Anti-Aging - Dr. Ronald Klatz
Published 1 year, 7 months ago
Description
Art Bell opens with Richard C. Hoagland discussing the upcoming film Mission to Mars and the exclusion of his research from the movie's official website, despite his decades of work on the Cydonia region. Hoagland notes the irony that NASA, which long dismissed the Face on Mars, served as consultants on a film about that very subject. The conversation also covers the Peter Gersten court case and a potential Mars lander signal detected by Stanford.
The main interview features Dr. Ronald Klatz, president of the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, alongside philosopher Dr. Vernon Howard from Tufts University. Dr. Klatz outlines five technologies that could lead to practical human immortality: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, stem cell transplants, hormone replacement therapy, and advanced cellular repair. He describes how a single gene modification in laboratory mice extended their maximum lifespan by 30 percent.
Dr. Howard raises the ethical and social implications of radically extended lifespans, questioning whether political structures, cultural attitudes, and economic systems can keep pace with the technology. The two academics engage in a spirited but respectful disagreement over whether society is prepared for an ageless future, with Dr. Klatz arguing the wealth generated by extended productive years would offset concerns about overpopulation and resource strain.
The main interview features Dr. Ronald Klatz, president of the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine, alongside philosopher Dr. Vernon Howard from Tufts University. Dr. Klatz outlines five technologies that could lead to practical human immortality: genetic engineering, nanotechnology, stem cell transplants, hormone replacement therapy, and advanced cellular repair. He describes how a single gene modification in laboratory mice extended their maximum lifespan by 30 percent.
Dr. Howard raises the ethical and social implications of radically extended lifespans, questioning whether political structures, cultural attitudes, and economic systems can keep pace with the technology. The two academics engage in a spirited but respectful disagreement over whether society is prepared for an ageless future, with Dr. Klatz arguing the wealth generated by extended productive years would offset concerns about overpopulation and resource strain.