Episode Details

Happy Friday!

Thank you to everyone across our district for the work you continue to do each day for our students. As we move deeper into the spring semester, the instructional focus of our classrooms becomes even more important. This is the time of year when the adjustments teachers make in instruction can have a significant impact on student learning as we move toward the spring ATLAS assessment. One of our goals as a district has always been to avoid simply hoping that learning is happening. Instead, we want to know where our students stand and respond with the best instruction possible.

This week, I would like to share several observations from our Winter ATLAS Interim assessments in English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science. Interim assessments serve an important purpose. They provide evidence of student learning at this point in the school year and help us determine where additional instructional attention can help students move from approaching proficiency to being proficient. They also allow us to compare our performance with the state average so that we have a clearer understanding of where we stand and what our next steps should be.

Achievement Level Descriptors and Strong Thinking

One of the most important themes that continues to emerge from the interim results is the importance of helping students understand what strong thinking looks like. We have been talking about assessing student performance using Achievement Level Descriptors, or ALDs. These descriptors outline the level of thinking students must demonstrate to reach proficiency. A Level 3 response, which represents proficient performance, generally requires students to explain their reasoning, apply knowledge to unfamiliar situations, support ideas with evidence, and analyze information rather than simply recall it.

During several of our leadership meetings this year, we have watched classroom videos that highlight instructional strategies designed to move students toward this level of thinking. One encouraging practice we have observed is that some of our teachers are explaining the Achievement Level Descriptors directly to their students so they understand the level of response that is expected. When students clearly understand what a strong response looks like, they are far more capable of producing it. They begin to see that success is not simply about arriving at the correct answer, but about demonstrating the reasoning and understanding behind that answer.

This matters for every classroom, not only those in the core academic areas. Whether students are asked to explain a solution in mathematics, support an interpretation in English Language Arts, analyze evidence in science, justify a design choice in a CTE course, or explain a performance decision in the arts, the same principle applies. Students grow when they understand the quality of thinking that is being asked of them.

English Language Arts

The winter interim results in English Language Arts show encouraging progress in several areas of literacy development. In the early grades, our students performed ahead of the state in important foundational measures. Kindergarten posted 44% proficient compared to 32% statewide, while Grade 1 reached 56% proficient compared to 34% statewide, and Grade 2 posted 39% proficient compared to 33% statewide. Grade 3 also remained ahead of the state at 35% proficient compared to 31% statewide. These results suggest that the instructional emphasis placed on foundational literacy skills is continuing to produce positive results for our students.

At the same time, the reports show that students face greater difficulty when standards require them to analyze texts and clearly explain their thinking in writing. Students are generally stronger when asked to demonstrate vocabulary knowledge and direct comprehension, but they experience more difficulty when asked to analyze how authors develop ideas and themes, c