Episode Details

Back to Episodes

Strategic Navigation or Stochastic Search? How Agents and Humans Reason Over Document Collections

Episode 1615 Published 4 days, 9 hours ago
Description

đŸ€— Upvotes: 40 | cs.CL, cs.AI

Authors:
Ɓukasz Borchmann, Jordy Van Landeghem, MichaƂ Turski, Shreyansh Padarha, Ryan Othniel Kearns, Adam Mahdi, Niels Rogge, ClĂ©mentine Fourrier, Siwei Han, Huaxiu Yao, Artemis LlabrĂ©s, Yiming Xu, Dimosthenis Karatzas, Hao Zhang, Anupam Datta

Title:
Strategic Navigation or Stochastic Search? How Agents and Humans Reason Over Document Collections

Arxiv:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12180v1

Abstract:
Multimodal agents offer a promising path to automating complex document-intensive workflows. Yet, a critical question remains: do these agents demonstrate genuine strategic reasoning, or merely stochastic trial-and-error search? To address this, we introduce MADQA, a benchmark of 2,250 human-authored questions grounded in 800 heterogeneous PDF documents. Guided by Classical Test Theory, we design it to maximize discriminative power across varying levels of agentic abilities. To evaluate agentic behaviour, we introduce a novel evaluation protocol measuring the accuracy-effort trade-off. Using this framework, we show that while the best agents can match human searchers in raw accuracy, they succeed on largely different questions and rely on brute-force search to compensate for weak strategic planning. They fail to close the nearly 20% gap to oracle performance, persisting in unproductive loops. We release the dataset and evaluation harness to help facilitate the transition from brute-force retrieval to calibrated, efficient reasoning.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us