Episode Details

We confront the hard truth that our design standards often fail the people they claim to serve, from Daley Wilhelm's expose on how "neutral" car safety ignored female physiology to Brad Frost's warning about the reckless rush to weaponize AI. As we navigate these ethical failures, we also face the internal tension of shifting from making screens to running research while wondering if AI will replace us or simply empower those who adapt. The community is holding its breath on these questions, but waiting for permission has never moved the field forward.

Articles Covered

• What happened to the car designed for women, by women? — Neutral design standards reflect male physiology, causing higher injury rates for women.
• Fin Product Updates: February recap — New procedures allow teams to test multi-step AI workflows before going live.

Community Discussions

• What will change your design workflow the most by 2026? — The biggest workflow change depends on how designers choose to adapt their habits.
• How to communicate better with PMs and Devs — A wide communication gap between designers and product teams risks preventing work from shipping.
• Transition from UX design to UX research — Many designers feel stuck trying to pivot from making screens to understanding user motivations.
• Is AI going to replace a lot of UX work? — Uncertainty remains, but jobs will likely go to those who know how to use AI rather than to AI itself.

Also in Today's Feed

• Building Dynamic Forms In React And Next.js — hello@smashingmagazine.com (Sunil Sandhu)
• A Designer’s Thoughts About This Moment in AI — Brad Frost

Also in Today's Thread

• help me improve this button — r/UI_Design
• New Figma Plugin for UX Copywriting — r/uxwriting
• Any CMU Alumni here? Found a concerning post — r/hci
• I’m a product designer who spent 6 months watching founders ship terrible UX. So I built something about it. — r/UXResearch