Episode Details
Back to EpisodesWho Needs A Big Spring For Texas?/ Texas Longhorns LIVE 91
Episode 151
Published 3 months ago
Description
Here are concise, structured episode notes for Texas Longhorns LIVE #91 titled "Who Needs A Big Spring For Texas?" hosted by Matthew Miller and Thomas Bresee on the TexasVOCFB channel.
Opening / General
- Episode 91 of Texas Longhorns Live
- Weekly show every Monday at 8 PM ET
- Sponsored by FanDuel
- Encouraged viewers to like, subscribe, and engage
Main Topic 1: Offensive Line Depth Outlook for Spring
Key points and consensus:
- Last year's line was a major weakness → significant turnover is viewed positively
- Potential starting five (if healthy & Lawrence Seymour eligible):
- LT: Trevor Goosby
- LG: Lawrence Seymour (huge "if" due to NCAA eligibility waiver)
- C: Connor Robertson
- RG: Brandon Baker
- RT: Melvin Siani (expected immediate starter)
- Big "ifs" that could make the line elite / national-title caliber:
- Lawrence Seymour's eligibility cleared (hosts believe ~90% likely under current NCAA rules)
- Andre Kojo returns fully healthy from ACL injury
- Depth concerns:
- Thin if Seymour is ruled ineligible
- Dylan Sikorski (new addition) viewed as average/developmental — may need to lose weight / improve footwork
- Key depth pieces to watch: Jordan Coleman, Jaden Chapman, John Turntine (freshman), Andre Kojo (versatile if healthy)
- Big picture:
- Hosts believe the line will be significantly improved even in worst case
- Could return to 2023–2024 level (very good) if everything breaks right
- Depth remains the biggest question mark — injuries could expose thin backups
- Spring is critical because Goosby likely limited (injury recovery) → opens reps for younger players
Main Topic 2: Arch Manning vs. John Mateer (Oklahoma QB) Debate
- Triggered by a Crane & Company (On3) segment claiming Mateer > Manning
- Hosts strongly disagree — called it "not really a debate"
- Arch Manning statistical edge (2025 freshman season):
- Better TD:INT ratio (26:7 vs. Mateer's 14:11 in best year)
- Higher QBR (78 vs. 65.1)
- Performed better against top-25 competition
- More passing yards than Mateer's best season despite fewer games/starts
- Mateer strengths — more rushing yards/TDs, gritty gamer style (compared to Max Duggan)
- Key arguments:
- Arch elevates when competition rises; Mateer stayed flat
- Wins are QB stat to an extent, but Oklahoma's defense carried Mateer more than talent
- Almost every metric favors Arch; hosts believe he'd win a nationwide poll overwhelmingly
- Consensus: Arch Manning is clearly the better QB prospect and likely better in 2026
Main Topic 3: Where Does Steve Sarkisian Rank Among Active Head Coaches?
- Reacting to Brandon Walker's (Barstool) top-10 list that put Sark at #7 and Lane Kiffin at #4
- Hosts' biggest disagreement: Lane Kiffin ranked way too high
- Sark has more playoff success, actually won playoff games, rebuilt Texas from a bad situation
- Kiffin's best year (Ole Miss near-title run) came after he left for Auburn
- Approximate host rankings:
- Top 3 locked (in some order): Kirby Smart, Curt Cignetti, Ryan Day
- Sark generally placed ~4–6 (hosts comfortable with 5 or 6)
- Ahead of Kiffin, Cristobal (late-game issues), Lanning (aggressive 4th-down style)
- In mix with Freeman, DeBoer, Lanning
- Sark praise: