Episode Details

Back to Episodes

Who Needs A Big Spring For Texas?/ Texas Longhorns LIVE 91

Episode 151 Published 3 months ago
Description

Here are concise, structured episode notes for Texas Longhorns LIVE #91 titled "Who Needs A Big Spring For Texas?" hosted by Matthew Miller and Thomas Bresee on the TexasVOCFB channel.

Opening / General

  • Episode 91 of Texas Longhorns Live
  • Weekly show every Monday at 8 PM ET
  • Sponsored by FanDuel
  • Encouraged viewers to like, subscribe, and engage

Main Topic 1: Offensive Line Depth Outlook for Spring

Key points and consensus:

  • Last year's line was a major weakness → significant turnover is viewed positively
  • Potential starting five (if healthy & Lawrence Seymour eligible):
    • LT: Trevor Goosby
    • LG: Lawrence Seymour (huge "if" due to NCAA eligibility waiver)
    • C: Connor Robertson
    • RG: Brandon Baker
    • RT: Melvin Siani (expected immediate starter)
  • Big "ifs" that could make the line elite / national-title caliber:
    1. Lawrence Seymour's eligibility cleared (hosts believe ~90% likely under current NCAA rules)
    2. Andre Kojo returns fully healthy from ACL injury
  • Depth concerns:
    • Thin if Seymour is ruled ineligible
    • Dylan Sikorski (new addition) viewed as average/developmental — may need to lose weight / improve footwork
    • Key depth pieces to watch: Jordan Coleman, Jaden Chapman, John Turntine (freshman), Andre Kojo (versatile if healthy)
  • Big picture:
    • Hosts believe the line will be significantly improved even in worst case
    • Could return to 2023–2024 level (very good) if everything breaks right
    • Depth remains the biggest question mark — injuries could expose thin backups
    • Spring is critical because Goosby likely limited (injury recovery) → opens reps for younger players

Main Topic 2: Arch Manning vs. John Mateer (Oklahoma QB) Debate

  • Triggered by a Crane & Company (On3) segment claiming Mateer > Manning
  • Hosts strongly disagree — called it "not really a debate"
  • Arch Manning statistical edge (2025 freshman season):
    • Better TD:INT ratio (26:7 vs. Mateer's 14:11 in best year)
    • Higher QBR (78 vs. 65.1)
    • Performed better against top-25 competition
    • More passing yards than Mateer's best season despite fewer games/starts
  • Mateer strengths — more rushing yards/TDs, gritty gamer style (compared to Max Duggan)
  • Key arguments:
    • Arch elevates when competition rises; Mateer stayed flat
    • Wins are QB stat to an extent, but Oklahoma's defense carried Mateer more than talent
    • Almost every metric favors Arch; hosts believe he'd win a nationwide poll overwhelmingly
  • Consensus: Arch Manning is clearly the better QB prospect and likely better in 2026

Main Topic 3: Where Does Steve Sarkisian Rank Among Active Head Coaches?

  • Reacting to Brandon Walker's (Barstool) top-10 list that put Sark at #7 and Lane Kiffin at #4
  • Hosts' biggest disagreement: Lane Kiffin ranked way too high
    • Sark has more playoff success, actually won playoff games, rebuilt Texas from a bad situation
    • Kiffin's best year (Ole Miss near-title run) came after he left for Auburn
  • Approximate host rankings:
    • Top 3 locked (in some order): Kirby Smart, Curt Cignetti, Ryan Day
    • Sark generally placed ~4–6 (hosts comfortable with 5 or 6)
    • Ahead of Kiffin, Cristobal (late-game issues), Lanning (aggressive 4th-down style)
    • In mix with Freeman, DeBoer, Lanning
  • Sark praise:
Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us