Episode Details
Back to Episodes
History: Science or Fiction Reading 4
Description
Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US
One on One Video Call W/George
https://tidycal.com/georgepmonty/60-minute-meeting
Transcript:
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/54419121
Here’s a link to a created doing a line by line breakdown:
https://www.youtube.com/c/Ctruth
Speaker 0 (0s): We're back. We've got number four part for of History Science or Fiction. What do you think so far? This series is below in my mind. I can't believe it. Well, part of me can't believe it. Part of me Can believe it. It makes sense, right? There's one guy Joseph's gallons here and he does all the dating or everyone takes his idea as the right idea.
You know what it sounds like to me, it sounds to me like Joseph's calendar. Like his dad was like a prominent lawyer and his son is some f**k off stoner. This is not doing s**t. When his life, he was like, Hey, Jo should get a g*****n job Joh. I told you, Dan, I want to be a wizard. Dad. I'm doing this new interpretive dance in my, in my suit of armor. Dad, I've got a job, a tournament later. Okay I told you, Joseph, we don't need another uncle Merlin around drinking, getting all boozed up, walking around with a big floppy hat in a big beard.
We don't need that. Joseph don't do this too. Your mother, Joseph, this is a very important job. Joseph people in the future are going to need these right dates. Kid gets all p****d off fine dads. I'll do it. Okay. If that will make you happy, I'll do it. So it gets in there and started going through all the book's. You know what I mean? Like he doesn't, he has no idea to look all that stuff up. It's kind of a lazy, he start date and stuff. Yay. Why not the 15th, 15th century now or whatever it is, it'll work.
So I was going to read this s**t anyway. Just kidding. History Fiction And or Science Science Science Science Part for everybody. I want to say thank you to everyone taking the time to play along, listen along and hopefully learn along.
I know I'm learning a lot and for me, as I read this, its it really helps me understand things better. I hope I'm truly hopeful that you dear listener will be able to get some value out of this. So here we go. Part for ancient historical events, geographic localization issues, 10.1 to locations of Troy in Babylon, the correct geographic localization of a large number of ancient historical events is truly a formidable task Naples.
For instance, whose name merely stands for new town is reflected in the ancient Chronicles as the following cities, one Naples in
Speaker 2 (3m 0s): Italy existing to this day to Carthage also translating as new town Naples in Palestine, the Savi in Naples to see the collection of the state history museum of Moscow. There were five new Rome, AKA Constantinople or Zahra grad, which could also be referred to as new town. Thus, if a chronical is referring to in event that occurred and Naples won has to devote all of one's attention to making sure one understands which town is meant.
Troy may be seen as yet. Another example, one of the consensual localizations for Homer's Troy is near the Hellespont straights. Schulman used this hypo hypothesis for solemn, the baptizing as Troy, if you're 100 by 100 meter excavation site of a minuscule ancient settlement that he had discovered near the hell spot, actually the very localization of hell spot in itself is highly