Episode Details

Back to Episodes
#109: When You Were Assured of BigLaw Partnership This Year But It Didn't Happen

#109: When You Were Assured of BigLaw Partnership This Year But It Didn't Happen

Episode 109 Published 8 months ago
Description

Being told you ready for partnership creates expectations that are hard to unlearn. In this episode, I walk through what it really means when you are encouraged, guided, and perhaps even implicitly promised by firm leadership, only to be told at the end of the cycle that you did not make partner. This is not just a professional disappointment. It often feels like a betrayal of an assumed agreement, especially when you followed the roadmap you were given and told if you followed that this was your year.

I explain why this situation is far more common in BigLaw than firms admit, including how headcount, internal politics, profitability pressures, and decision-making power can quietly override performance. I unpack why encouragement is not the same as influence, why firms often avoid hard truths during partnership conversations, and how vague feedback keeps lawyers stuck in uncertainty. I also outline how to approach post-decision conversations strategically, what questions actually surface usable information, and how to distinguish between fixable gaps, moving goalposts, and structural ceilings in determining whether you actually make partnership at your firm.

At a Glance
01:20 What it means to be "in consideration" for partnership
02:08 Why doing exactly what you were told would mean partnership can still mean "no"
03:01 Why missing partnership feels like a broken narrative, not just rejection
04:23 How reliance on firm guidance costs lawyers optionality and time
05:29 Why encouragement is not the same as decision-making power
06:18 How firms avoid hard truths through vague feedback
07:21 How to prepare for partnership conversations without burning bridges
07:48 Why post-decision meetings are about information, not catharsis
08:16 The exact process questions that surface real explanations
09:09 How to determine whether issues are fixable or structural
10:21 What a fixable partnership gap actually looks like in practice
11:25 How to recognize when the goalposts are always moving
12:20 What it means to hit a structural ceiling in the firm that may block partnership
14:26 Why quietly exploring external options is rational, not disloyal
16:11 How to reframe not making partner as information, not failure

Rate, Review, & Follow on Apple Podcasts & Spotify
Do you enjoy listening to Big Law Life?  Please consider rating and reviewing the show! This helps support and reach more people like you who want to grow a career in Big Law. 

For Apple Podcasts, click here, scroll to the bottom, tap to rate with five stars, and select "Write a Review." Then be sure to let me know what you loved most about the episode! Also, if you haven't done so already, follow the podcast here! 

For Spotify, tap here on your mobile phone, follow the podcast, listen to the show, then find the rating icon below the description, and tap to rate with five stars.

Interested in doing 1-2-1 coaching with Laura Terrell? Or learning more about her work coaching and consulting?

Here are ways to reach out to her:

www.lauraterrell.com 

laura@lauraterrell.com  

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauralterrell/ 

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lauraterrellcoaching/ 

Show

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us