Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Israel Today: Ongoing War Report - Update from 2026-01-18 at 19:06
Published 1 month, 1 week ago
Description
HEADLINES
US Israel debate over Iran strike
Gaza governance plan triggers sovereignty concerns
Iraq gains security control as US exits
The time is now 2:00 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.
This is your hourly news update. The geopolitical picture in the Middle East remains tense and fluid as global powers weigh next moves around Iran, the ripple effects of domestic protests in Iran, and evolving arrangements for Gaza and regional governance.
First, the situation around Iran and Israel. Reports outline a period of rapid momentum behind the scenes in Washington and Jerusalem as American officials weighed options that could change the regional balance. Israeli leaders have publicly signaled concern about timelines and the potential for retaliation, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is described as having urged restraint and pause on a potential strike while coordinating with Washington. Israeli officials have privately noted a swift and large-scale protest movement inside Iran, with estimates of casualties running into the thousands during the initial surge, and about one million people taking to the streets in the days surrounding the clashes. Analysts say the protests have placed heavy pressure on Iran’s leadership, even as Tehran has framed the crackdown as maintaining order. Across this landscape, Washington has signaled willingness to act, but has recalibrated its approach as it repositions naval assets and weighs how a strike would affect the course of the protests and the regime’s response.
In Washington and Jerusalem, the line between deterrence and escalation remains delicate. Observers say any action against Iran, even if aimed at slowing the regime’s capacity, risks driving internal Iran dynamics in unpredictable directions and could provoke a broader regional confrontation. In Israel, the prevailing view among security strategists is that direct involvement in Iran should be limited and carefully calibrated, to avoid amplifying the regime’s narrative of external aggression and to prevent giving Tehran an opening to rally the public around a perceived external threat. At the same time, Israel insists on maintaining robust defenses and deterring any action that could threaten its security or allow a wider conflict to unfold.
Turning to international diplomacy, the United States has floated a “Board of Peace” concept intended to address Gaza first and then broader conflicts. The plan has drawn cautious reaction from allies in Europe and beyond, with concerns about the impact on the United Nations framework and questions about how a charter would interact with existing international institutions. A number of governments have expressed reservations, while others signaled openness to discussions. In Jerusalem, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said the Israeli government was not fully consulted about the board, and that he asked Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar to raise concerns with the US Secretary of State. The proposal envisions a technocratic governance structure for Gaza during a transitional period, but critics warn that placing governance in the hands of external actors would raise questions about sovereignty and the day-after arrangements for the territory.
In related domestic matters, Israel’s political debate continues over how to approach Gaza and the post-conflict environment. A Knesset committee confronting sexual violence cases heard testimony from victims and supporters calling for changes to how the system handles accusations and gag orders. The testimonies highlighted long-standing concerns about delays, accountability, and transparency in the investigative process and drew calls for legislative remedies to improve victims’ access to information and enforcement. Lawmakers stressed that any future leadership of the state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries should be weighed ag
US Israel debate over Iran strike
Gaza governance plan triggers sovereignty concerns
Iraq gains security control as US exits
The time is now 2:00 PM in New York, I'm Noa Levi and this is the latest Israel Today: Ongoing War Report.
This is your hourly news update. The geopolitical picture in the Middle East remains tense and fluid as global powers weigh next moves around Iran, the ripple effects of domestic protests in Iran, and evolving arrangements for Gaza and regional governance.
First, the situation around Iran and Israel. Reports outline a period of rapid momentum behind the scenes in Washington and Jerusalem as American officials weighed options that could change the regional balance. Israeli leaders have publicly signaled concern about timelines and the potential for retaliation, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is described as having urged restraint and pause on a potential strike while coordinating with Washington. Israeli officials have privately noted a swift and large-scale protest movement inside Iran, with estimates of casualties running into the thousands during the initial surge, and about one million people taking to the streets in the days surrounding the clashes. Analysts say the protests have placed heavy pressure on Iran’s leadership, even as Tehran has framed the crackdown as maintaining order. Across this landscape, Washington has signaled willingness to act, but has recalibrated its approach as it repositions naval assets and weighs how a strike would affect the course of the protests and the regime’s response.
In Washington and Jerusalem, the line between deterrence and escalation remains delicate. Observers say any action against Iran, even if aimed at slowing the regime’s capacity, risks driving internal Iran dynamics in unpredictable directions and could provoke a broader regional confrontation. In Israel, the prevailing view among security strategists is that direct involvement in Iran should be limited and carefully calibrated, to avoid amplifying the regime’s narrative of external aggression and to prevent giving Tehran an opening to rally the public around a perceived external threat. At the same time, Israel insists on maintaining robust defenses and deterring any action that could threaten its security or allow a wider conflict to unfold.
Turning to international diplomacy, the United States has floated a “Board of Peace” concept intended to address Gaza first and then broader conflicts. The plan has drawn cautious reaction from allies in Europe and beyond, with concerns about the impact on the United Nations framework and questions about how a charter would interact with existing international institutions. A number of governments have expressed reservations, while others signaled openness to discussions. In Jerusalem, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said the Israeli government was not fully consulted about the board, and that he asked Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar to raise concerns with the US Secretary of State. The proposal envisions a technocratic governance structure for Gaza during a transitional period, but critics warn that placing governance in the hands of external actors would raise questions about sovereignty and the day-after arrangements for the territory.
In related domestic matters, Israel’s political debate continues over how to approach Gaza and the post-conflict environment. A Knesset committee confronting sexual violence cases heard testimony from victims and supporters calling for changes to how the system handles accusations and gag orders. The testimonies highlighted long-standing concerns about delays, accountability, and transparency in the investigative process and drew calls for legislative remedies to improve victims’ access to information and enforcement. Lawmakers stressed that any future leadership of the state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries should be weighed ag