Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Revision following peer review is a normal part of the scholarly writing process
Published 3 years, 11 months ago
Description
This track addresses the frustration of dealing with reviewer comments post-peer review. It expands on the conversation with Katherine Firth to propose that we should consider being edited a normal part of the writing process.Read the post here: https://jovanevery.co.uk/revision-following-peer-review-normal/For more content like this, sign up to the monthly newsletter: jovanevery.co.uk/newsletterFollow me on Twitter: twitter.com/JoVanEveryFind my Facebook Page here: facebook.com/JoVEAcademicCareerCoach Join the Academic Writing Studio: academicwritingstudio.co.uk
For more advice, support and perspectives like this, sign up to my free monthly newsletter: https://jovanevery.co.uk/newsletter
To find out how short chunks of time can revolutionise your writing, take the FREE 15 Minute Writing Challenge course: https://jovanevery.co.uk/15-min-writing-challenge/
Or join the Academic Writing Studio community: https://academicwritingstudio.co.uk
Support me on KoFi here: https://ko-fi.com/jovanevery
I'm no longer on Twitter, but I'm on Bluesky here: https://bsky.app/profile/jovanevery.bsky.social
Find me on Linked In here: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jovanevery/
Or follow along on Facebook here: https://facebook.com/JoVEAcademicCareerCoach