Episode Details

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

Watch the fiery argument between me and Dr. J. Michael Springmann, concerning the role of ICE and the murder of René Good, beginning at the 24:30 mark.

Who’s behind the recent wave of attacks and threats on and by the United States?

The US kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro wasn’t just an attack on Venezuela. It was also an attack on America.

The United States of America is not a “deep” organic nation featuring people who have lived there for many centuries under gradually-evolving cultural traditions, including language and religion. It emerged only 250 years ago as an idea, and that idea is enshrined in the Constitution, whose main function is to prevent autocratic, tyrannical rule. To that end, the president cannot make law, only execute it. He cannot declare war, only command it.

The Trump regime is not just attacking the Constitution. It is an ongoing attack on the Constitution.

Last week Trump’s ongoing unconstitutional attacks on American cities led to the murder of Renée Nicole Good, a mother of three young children, in Minneapolis. Trump’s goons, mostly overweight unemployable louts with beer bellies and atrophied brains who signed on for the lavish bonuses, have been routinely violating the 4th Amendment by stopping, interrogating and harassing people without probable cause to believe they have committed a crime. Now they are flipping out and shooting moms who disrespect them.

Does Trump have the right to send National Guard troops under his command into cities that voted against him, in order to punish his political enemies? Of course not. Cursory research reveals what the “arguments” on both sides of this “controversy” actually are:

The constitutional authority to deploy the National Guard is actually assigned to Congress, not the president. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress the power to “provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions”. Militias have been interpreted to include the National Guard.

However, the Constitution also charges the president with two very significant duties. The first is to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”; the second is to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed”. These two duties can amount to a significant grant of power in times of crisis.

So if there were an insurrection or invasion, Congress could deploy the National Guard. The president’s only role would be to “defend the Constitution” (including Article 1, Section 8) by taking care that the laws passed by Congress, such as deploying the National Guard if necessary, be faithfully executed.

But there obviously is no insurrection or invasion. Those calling excessive and/or illegal immigration an “invasion” are, of course, morons. If the immigrants were using military force to overwhelm the native police and military and seize political power at gunpoint, that would be an invasion…like Trump’s invasion of Venezuela. But that is very far from the case. No matter how much you dislike illegal immigration, lying about it only undermines your credibility. When the Founding Fathers used the word “invasion”