Episode Details

Back to Episodes
An Accidental Landmark? How VanDerStok Could Revive Deference to the Administrative State

An Accidental Landmark? How VanDerStok Could Revive Deference to the Administrative State

Season 1 Episode 77 Published 7 months ago
Description

Chevron deference may be gone—but is the Supreme Court quietly laying the groundwork for something even worse?

In this episode of Unwritten Law, Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione examine a recent Supreme Court decision that could dramatically reshape administrative law. Drawing on analysis by Will Yeatman, they discuss how the Court’s handling of VanDerStok risks giving agencies a powerful new shield by treating challenges to regulations as “facial” attacks—making them nearly impossible to win.

The conversation dives into why this approach departs from traditional administrative-law principles, how lower courts may use it to avoid meaningful judicial review, and why this decision could become a dangerous tool for future administrations—regardless of political party.

If you care about limits on bureaucratic power, the future of post-Chevron litigation, or the proper role of courts in reviewing agency action, this episode explains why VanDerStok is an issue worth watching closely.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us