Episode Details

Back to Episodes

Should Cardio be a News Years Resolution?

Episode 105 Published 7 months, 2 weeks ago
Description
Exercise as a Tool: Cardio, Bias, and What Actually Works

Exercise is a tool — and we’ve used it very differently over the decades.

Think about it:
In the 1950s, “exercise” wasn’t really a thing the way it is now. People moved, they danced (my parents and grandparents were ballroom dancers), but it wasn’t packaged as “workouts.”

Then we got the eras:

  • 70s/80s/90s: jogging + long, steady-state cardio

  • 2000s: long-duration cardio gave way to “more intense”

  • HIIT + Peloton era: quick, sweaty, efficient

  • Now: thankfully… the emphasis is finally where it belongs — resistance training

But that leaves people wondering:

Where does cardio fit now?
Do I need it?
What kind? How much?
Is HIIT better than steady state?
Should I walk more?

Let’s make it simple: it depends on the goal — and the timeline.

🔧 Coaching Without Bias

One of the biggest problems in fitness is that people coach from bias.

Meaning:
They coach what they personally like…
not what the goal actually requires.

Example (and yes, people hate me saying this):
If your goal is muscle gain and you tell me you do Pilates and yoga five days a week… I’m going to say:

“Great… wrong tool.”

Not saying don’t do it.
Just saying don’t expect it to build muscle.

It’s like my teenage swimmers:
If they want to be better at swimming, am I going to put them on a treadmill for an hour?

No. Wrong tool.

The right tool depends on the goal — not your preference.

🏋️ Resistance Training: The Right Tool for Midlife

Resistance training isn’t just about aesthetics.
It’s foundational for midlife health because muscle is not “just muscle” — it’s metabolic, structural, protective tissue.

But today’s focus is cardio — because cardio has become confusing.

And it’s confusing because the “best cardio” has changed every decade… mostly due to trends and preference.

So here’s how I coach it:

⏳ The First Question I Ask: “How long have we got?”

The number one reason diets fail is unreasonable expectations.

So when someone says:
“I want to lose 30 pounds in 6 weeks…”

I’m not going to cheerlead that.
I’m going to coach reality.

Because the plan depends on timeframe.

🎯 Short-Term Fat Loss: Nutrition Does the Heavy Lifting

If the goal is short-term (days to a few weeks), cardio is rarely the main tool.

Example: my Peak Week / 5-Day Shred.

It’s a 5-day diet + 7-day program with 4 coaching calls and people drop weight fast — but there’s no exercise requirement.

Because if the goal is fast results:

  • nutrition creates the environment quickest

  • cardio doesn’t move the needle much in 5 days

  • and adding lots of cardio often makes people hungrier and less compliant

And once you push beyond about 30 minutes, cardio can increase appetite for many people.

So in short-term phases, the question becomes:

“Is the juice worth the squeeze?”

If cardio makes you hungrier and less compliant, it can work against the result.

🧱 Long-Term Results: Exercise Becomes Non-Negotiable

If the goal is long-term fat loss and keeping it off, exercise matters a lot more.

Here’s something fascinating:

Multiple long-term weight loss studies (people maintaining results 2+ years) show a consistent theme:

The vast majority of long-term successful maintainers walk a lot.

And the data tends to land around this:

✅ ~350 calories/day burned through exercise
(as an average)

Not every day has to be exactly 350 — it can average out:

  • some days 250

  • some days 500
    but roughly… it balances out.

This is

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us