Episode 1251
Have you ever overheard a CEO discussing a merger at a restaurant and wondered if you could trade on it? In this episode, we dive into the high-stakes world of insider trading, exploring the thin legal line between market research and financial fraud.
We break down the complex definitions of who actually counts as an "insider"—from corporate directors and major shareholders to friends, family members, and even printers who steal information from their employers,,. We’ll discuss the "misappropriation theory," which holds that you don’t need to work for a company to be guilty of trading on its secrets; you just have to break a duty of trust to the source of the information,.
In this episode, we cover:
Join us as we explain why the law tries to ensure the stock market isn't just a rigged game.
Analogy to solidify understanding: Imagine a high-stakes poker game. In a fair game, everyone sees their own cards and the community cards on the table (public information). Insider trading is like a player sneaking a peek at the deck before the cards are dealt. While economists like Friedman might argue that seeing the cards early helps the game end faster (market efficiency), the regulators argue that once the other players realize the game is rigged, they will take their chips and go home, destroying the casino entirely,.
Published on 1 day, 12 hours ago
If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.
Donate