Podcast Episode Details
Back to Podcast Episodes
Court Orders vs. Constitutional Freedoms: The Government Responds To Diddy's Bail Push (Part 3)
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian opposing Combs' renewed bail application. This submission followed the November 22, 2024, bail hearing, during which the court requested clarification on whether Combs' actions amounted to obstruction under the Bail Reform Act. The government's letter argues that Combs' conduct, including alleged attempts to influence witnesses and violations of jail communication protocols, constitutes obstruction, thereby justifying continued detention. The prosecution emphasizes that such behavior poses a significant risk to the integrity of the judicial process and supports their position against granting bail.
The letter further details specific instances where Combs allegedly engaged in obstructive behavior, such as unauthorized communications with potential witnesses and efforts to tamper with evidence. The prosecution contends that these actions demonstrate a clear disregard for legal procedures and underscore the potential danger of releasing Combs pending trial. They assert that granting bail would not only undermine the judicial process but also pose a risk to public safety, given the serious nature of the charges and the defendant's alleged attempts to interfere with the case. The government concludes by urging the court to deny Combs' bail application to preserve the integrity of the proceedings and ensure justice is served.
(commercial at 13:20)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.86.0.pdf
Published on 11 hours ago