Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium (Rosaia 2025) | FT50 ECTA

Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium (Rosaia 2025) | FT50 ECTA

Season 1 Published 5 months, 3 weeks ago
Description

English Podcast Starts at 00:00:00

Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:18:48

Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:36:12

German Podcast Starts at 00:50:09


Reference

Rosaia, N. (2025). Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium. Econometrica, 93(6), 2235–2271. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta21773


Supplement and Replication Package: https://www.econometricsociety.org/publications/econometrica/2025/11/01/Competing-Platforms-and-Transport-Equilibrium



‌Youtube Channel

⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠

Connect over linkedin

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/


Welcome to “Revise and Resubmit” 🎙️📚 — where heavyweight theory puts on headphones, gets in a cab, and rides through the real world with you.

Tonight, we’re not just hailing a ride. We’re hailing a market. 🚕📱
Two apps. One city. Millions of tiny decisions: tap here, wait there, surge now, cancel later.
On your screen, it’s a simple map with a moving car.
Underneath, it’s a battle of platformstraffic flows, and social welfare measured in millions. 💸🌆

Our paper for this episode is
👉 “Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium”
by Nicola Rosaia, published in Econometrica — a prestigious FT50 journal — Volume 93, Issue 6, November 2025, from The Econometric Society and Wiley. 🏛️✨

Here’s the puzzle:
When Uber and Lyft (or any big platforms) compete, do we get efficiency… or waste?
Are we seeing smart competition, or just two half-empty networks clogging the same streets? 🚗🚗💨

Nicola Rosaia builds a spatial model of the ride-hailing market in New York City, powered by detailed data from two major platforms. Then comes the twist: by running counterfactual worlds, the paper asks, “What if we changed the rules?” 🧪

The results hit hard:

  • Fragmented platforms and market power together burn 176176 million dollars of social welfare every year and waste 21% of driver-generated traffic.

  • platform merger would pool everyone into one big network, cutting traffic by 8%, but at a cost: prices up 4%, consumer surplus down 7777 million per year.

  • Interoperability regulation — letting networks talk and drivers multi-home — captures most of the efficiency: wasteful traffic down 6%, while consumer surplus rises by 6363 million a year. 📉🚦📈

So one simple tap on a ride-hailing app turns out to be anything but simple.
It’s a choice shaped by algorithmspricing power, and who is allowed to work for whom.
Competition gives you options. Fragmentation gives you traffic. Regulation reshapes the game. ⚖️

A huge thank you to Nicola Rosaia, to The Econometric Society, to Wiley, and to the prestigious FT50 journal Econometrica for this sharp, data-rich look at how platforms move people—and money—through our cities. 🙏📖

If you enjoy this kind of deep dive into cutting-edge research, hit subscribe to
🎧 “Revise and Resubmit” on SpotifyAmazon Prime, and Apple Podcast,
and don’t forget our 🎥 YouTube channel “Weekend Researcher” for more geeky-yet-fun explorations of academic work.

So as we roll into this episode, here’s the

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us