Podcast Episode Details
Back to Podcast Episodes
E72 - Why IULs Almost Always Fail: The Kyle Busch $8.5M Lawsuit
Season 1 Episode 69
Two-time NASCAR champion Kyle Busch just lost $8.5 million in an Indexed Universal Life policy after paying $10.5 million in premiums. This isn't just celebrity drama—it's a case study in why 90%+ of IULs collapse and why we'll never sell one.
IULs try to be insurance, savings, and investment all in one product. The result? A policy full of moving parts, changing cap rates, rising mortality charges, and a "path of least resistance" that leads most people to stop funding properly. By your 70s, the annual insurance cost skyrockets while your cash value evaporates. The company transfers risk back to you—the opposite of what insurance should do.
Whole life insurance has guaranteed increases, true downside protection, unlimited upside potential, and a 200+ year track record. Don't mix protection, savings, and growth into one product. Keep them separate. Think in years, measure in weeks. And whatever you do, don't "IUL" your financial future.
Chapters:
00:00 - Opening segment
01:44 - Kyle Busch
$8.5M IUL lawsuit introduced
03:51 - How did this happen? Bobby Samuelson article breakdown
05:43 - Agent structured policy to maximize his compensation
07:21 - Why celebrity cases expose industry-wide problems
09:19 - How IULs work: cap rates, floors, participation rates
13:07 - The mortality charge death spiral explained
14:32 - Real client story
18:32 - Why policies collapse in your 70s and 80s
20:18 - Net amount at risk breakdown
22:11 - IULs transfer risk back to you (opposite of insurance)
22:54 - Protect, Save, Grow: Don't mix them
26:13 - Why IULs exist and why they fail
28:17 - Whole life dividends vs IUL flexibility traps
32:52 - Proper protection across all life areas
35:12 - Long-term thinking vs optimization traps
38:17 - Conservative approach to new growth strategies
40:12 - Don't "IUL" your trading or life insurance
42:30 - Closing segment
Key Takeaways:
Kyle Busch lost $8.5M of $10.5M in premiums in an IUL—brings national attention to product failure rates
IULs have cap rates (max return), floors (usually 0%), and participation rates—but companies can change caps anytime
90%+ of IULs collapse because of human behavior traps and rising mortality charges in later years
IULs charge monthly mortality based on net amount at risk—when policy underperforms, charges increase
Insurance should transfer risk to the company—IULs transfer risk back to you
Whole life has guaranteed increases every year, true downside protection, unlimited upside potential, and 200+ year track record
Don't mix protection, savings, and growth—keep them separate and intentional
Think in years, measure in weeks—stay conservative even when you find better strategies
Only time to "buy term and invest the difference": when your only other option is an IUL
Got Questions? Reach out to us at info@remnantfinance.com or book a call at https://remnantfinance.com/calendar !
Visit https://remnantfinance.com for more information
FOLLOW REMNANT FINANCE
Youtube: @RemnantFinance (https://www.youtube.com/@RemnantFinance )
Facebook: @remnantfinance (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61560694316588 )
Twitter: @remnantfinance (https://x.com/remnantfinance )
TikTok: @RemnantFinance
Don't forget to hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE
Published on 18 hours ago