Episode 9
Watch here: https://youtu.be/Je3ynVTQrXs
Craig builds a meditation app in 15 minutes to demonstrate how AI is fundamentally changing our relationship with smartphones—and potentially making traditional apps obsolete. The Meditation App Experiment The Problem: Craig was frustrated with his meditation app constantly asking him to log in, share data, and navigate unnecessary features. He just wanted something simple: a timer that chimes at the start, middle, and end. The Solution: Using Claude AI, he built a custom meditation app in approximately 15 minutes (plus deployment to his phone). The entire process: Created a simple meditation timer with specific requirements Made it "woody zen" in appearance through natural language prompting Deployed as a Progressive Web App (PWA) to his Google Pixel 9 Shared all code publicly on GitHub—written entirely by AI, including instructions The Result: A functional, personalized meditation app that does exactly what he needs, nothing more. The Death of Apps Thesis Craig argues we're witnessing the beginning of the end for traditional smartphone apps. His reasoning: Common Problems Get Solved: Throughout tech history, universal problems eventually become utilities (like cloud computing replacing everyone building their own data centers). Apps are next. Ephemeral Code: What took weeks to build now takes hours. Soon, AI will generate apps on-the-fly to solve immediate problems, then either: Disappear after use, or Join a library for future retrieval when someone needs the same solution The Future Interface: Instead of hunting through app stores, your phone becomes a true personal assistant. You state a problem ("I want to tune my guitar"), and AI generates the solution instantly—no installation, no data sharing, no login screens. The Deloitte Academic Paper Incident Emmanuella raises the recent controversy where Deloitte was hired to analyze problematic code but instead published an academic paper. Her analysis: The wrong command was given. Key insight: Deloitte hired a team and used AI to do something it was told to do, but the initial instruction was incorrect. The tool served the wrong purpose because the human question was wrong. Deep Philosophical Questions On Prompting as a Skill Emmanuella observes that prompting AI effectively requires: Specificity and brevity Iteration and refinement Understanding what outcome you actually want Consideration of whether the purpose is appropriate She predicts schools will need entire subjects dedicated to prompting. On Logic vs. Intelligence A fascinating historical example: When computers were introduced to Black and Hispanic communities in the US, IQ scores increased—not because students became "smarter," but because their thinking adapted to computational logic (which IQ tests measure). Emmanuella's concern: We're optimizing for computational logic at the expense of emotional, human, and spiritual intelligence. This imbalance contributes to rising anxiety and depression. On Productivity vs. Equilibrium Self-identifying as a "human puddle," Emmanuella questions whether productivity gains are worth the cost: "Is our time connecting and being undermined at the expense of productivity?" On Creativity Craig was asked by a senior leader: "Is creativity just remixing old ideas, or is it bigger?" His answer: Creativity pulls inspiration from many sources, sometimes mysterious ones. It's bigger than remix. The human element matters—AI is built on systems like IQ tests that channel curiosity into predictable paths. On Tech Waste Emmanuella wonders if we'll eventually develop consciousness about AI waste the way we have about plastic—recognizing that technology costs the earth something and asking whether uses are frivolous. Cultural Differences Craig shares intriguing research: Anglo-Western countries are the most pessimistic about AI in multiple studies. East Asian and non-English speaking countries tend to b
Published on 1 week ago
If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.
Donate