Podcast Episode Details
Back to Podcast Episodes
London Calling! Paging Trump-Epstein!
Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link
In 2008, Nicholas Kollerstrom, an Honorary Research Fellow at University College London, was summarily expelled for thoughtcrime. Dr. Kollerstrom, a left-leaning pacifist and historian of science by profession, had contested the official sacred narrative of the Nazi Holocaust. For weighing in on the issue of scientific evidence surrounding the alleged use of mass extermination gas chambers, Nick Kollerstrom became the only UCL scholar in history ever to have been expelled for ideological reasons. His university held no hearings, offered no due process, and gave him no opportunity to tell his side of the story. In essence, he was condemned and expelled for heresy—for questioning the sacred myth that has legitimized the genocide of Palestine.
Fortunately, Dr. Kollerstrom is still active in the field of public education. His book Breaking the Spell: Holocaust Myth and Reality outlines his position on the issue that got him expelled. His discussion group Keep Talking is the premier free speech salon in the UK and perhaps the entire Western world. What’s more, he seems to have found a new job co-hosting False Flag Weekly News, my weekly news roundup where heretical viewpoints are welcomed.
The topic that dominated our FFWN conversation, naturally enough, was the erosion of free speech in Western societies in general and their Anglo-American avant-garde in particular. In the past, it was taken for granted that anyone could show up in Hyde Park, London and express any political opinion whatsoever from atop a soapbox. Today, retired and disabled people are being dragged off to jail for holding placards saying “I support Palestine action.” (Palestine Action is a nonviolent protest group that has been given a ludicrous “terrorist” designation.) At least 1600 people, so far, have been arrested for that “crime.” Famous authors are canceling trips to the UK for fear of being arrested.
Likewise, in the United States, it was taken for granted until around 2015 that anyone could express any political opinion on any internet platform (as opposed to publication) and that the platform owners, and the government, were required to treat all views with complete neutrality. But when that threatened to produce a mass awakening to the realities of who really killed the Kennedys, who really did 9/11, and who really rules the Western world, among other hot-button topics, our rulers decided to crack down. The lynchpin of their suppression-of-speech strategy has involved placing a blackmailed faux-populist authoritarian sociopath in the White House, twice, and using the resulting polarization to generate endless “emergencies” justifying the suppression of free speech.
The latest such “emergency” is the single-bullet assassination of Charlie Kirk, ostensibly by an Oswald
Published on 9 hours ago