Episode 192
The Hockey Canada verdicts are final, but the story isn’t. In Part 2, Kristi Lee looks closely at the most talked-about evidence, how it was reflected in the written decision, and how that shaped public opinion. Thanks for your patience!
In this episode:
Content Warning: Details of sexual acts.
PLEASE NOTE: This series does not dispute the judge’s verdicts. Instead, it highlights a deeper truth: contradictions and inconsistencies existed on both sides, yet the accused players’ accounts were overwhelmingly accepted while the victim-complainant's was dismissed as “not credible or reliable.” Regardless of verdicts, our position is that this framing was both unnecessary and harmful — and its impact reaches far beyond the trial itself.
This is a three part series. Coming up in Part 3:
More information and resources:
Let us know what you think! Follow Canadian True Crime on Facebook and Instagram
Full list of resources, information sources, and more: www.canadiantruecrime.ca/episodes
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Published on 2 days, 4 hours ago
If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.
Donate