Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Clinton’s Closet: Russia’s Dirt & Democrat Deceptions
Description
The stench of scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party has grown impossible to ignore, thanks to a bombshell House Intelligence Committee report declassified last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. This long-suppressed document, dated September 18, 2020, and locked away in a CIA vault until now, exposes a sordid tale of Russian intelligence gathering compromising material on Clinton—material that Vladimir Putin allegedly planned to weaponize against her had she won the 2016 presidential election.
The revelations not only shred the Democrats’ sanctimonious narrative about Russian interference but also lay bare the hypocrisy and machinations of the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration, which colluded to peddle a fabricated Russia-Trump hoax while ignoring their own vulnerabilities.
The report, spearheaded by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) and championed for release by current Chairman Rick Crawford (R-AR), paints a damning picture. Russian intelligence, according to the document, had dirt on Clinton that would make a tabloid blush: allegations of “heavy tranquilizer” use, “uncontrolled fits of anger,” and a litany of health issues, including type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and deep vein thrombosis.
Senior Democrat leaders, including then-President Barack Obama, reportedly found Clinton’s condition “extraordinarily alarming.” Yet, rather than addressing these vulnerabilities, the Obama administration and Clinton’s campaign buried the truth, projecting an image of strength while secretly trembling at the thought of Russia’s leverage.
What’s particularly galling is the Democrats’ audacity to scream “Russia collusion” at Donald Trump while Clinton was the one sitting on a powder keg of compromising material. The report reveals that Russia anticipated a Clinton victory and withheld this intelligence, planning to exploit it to manipulate her presidency. Far from favoring Trump, as the Democrats’ fevered narrative claimed, Russia saw Clinton as the softer target—a candidate they could “work with” because they “knew where she stood.” This directly contradicts the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), which conveniently glossed over evidence of Russia’s preference for Clinton, pushing instead the now-debunked story of Trump as Putin’s puppet.
The hypocrisy is agonizingly infuriating. While Clinton’s team, with Obama’s blessing, bankrolled the infamous Steele dossier—a shoddy piece of opposition research riddled with fabrications—to smear Trump with baseless Russia ties, they ignored the real dirt in their own backyard. The dossier, funded through the law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS, was a desperate attempt to distract from Clinton’s email scandal and paint Trump as a Kremlin stooge.
Meanwhile, Russian hackers had already breached the Democrat National Committee and Clinton campaign accounts, uncovering details about her health and secret deals with religious groups for campaign support. The Democrats’ deflection game was in full swing, and the Obama administration’s intelligence apparatus, led by figures like CIA Director John Brennan, played along, suppressing evidence that contradicted their preferred narrative.
Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification of this report, alongside other documents exposing the Obama administration’s role in laying the groundwork for the Trump-Russia collusion probe, is a seismic blow to the Democrats’ credibility. Gabba