Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

Oral Argument: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

Season 2024 Episode 37 Published 1 year, 1 month ago
Description

Case Info: Esteras v. United States | Case No. 23-7483 | Date Argued: 2/25/25

Link to Docket: Here.

Background:

The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(A)-the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense.

Question Presented: Even though Congress excluded section 3553(a)(2)(A) from section 3583(e)'s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, may a district court rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release?

Oral Advocates:

  • For Petitioners: Christian J. Grostic, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • For Respondent: Masha G. Hansford, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us