In the case of Doe v. Combs et al., No. 1:24-cv-07975-AT, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a Memorandum of Law in support of her motion to proceed anonymously. She argued that revealing her identity could lead to significant personal and professional harm, given the sensitive nature of her allegations against high-profile defendants, including Sean Combs. The plaintiff emphasized that anonymity would not prejudice the defendants, as they would still have the opportunity to fully defend against her claims.
The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously, allowing her to use the pseudonym "Jane Doe" in the proceedings. This decision was made to protect the plaintiff's privacy and to encourage individuals to come forward with legitimate claims without fear of retribution or undue harm. The court noted that the defendants would be given an opportunity to respond to the motion after being served, ensuring a fair process for both parties.
(commercial at 7:40)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.630244.34.0.pdf
Published on 2 months, 2 weeks ago
If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.
Donate