Episode Details

Back to Episodes
πŸ“ β€œWhat Are Primary Surgical Options To Repair A Subcondylar Fracture?”

πŸ“ β€œWhat Are Primary Surgical Options To Repair A Subcondylar Fracture?”

Published 1Β year ago
Description

Quick Review #272 - #surgery #surgeon #doctorgallagher #oralsurgery #oralsurgeon #omfs #dentist #dentistry #dental


- 3.19.25


The primary treatment options for reducing a subcondylar neck/ramus fracture include both open and closed techniques, with the choice depending on factors such as displacement, occlusion, functional needs, and associated injuries.


1. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF)

β€’ Indication: ORIF is recommended for significantly displaced fractures, functional deviation, occlusal discrepancies, or bilateral condylar fractures with a risk of open bite.

β€’ Technique: A preauricular, retromandibular, or transoral approach is commonly used to expose the fracture, followed by fixation using mini-plates or lag screws.


Advantages:

β€’ Direct visualization of the fracture

β€’ Anatomical reduction and rigid fixation

β€’ Immediate function restoration


Disadvantages:

β€’ Surgical risks: facial nerve injury, scarring, and infection

β€’ Longer operative time


2. Closed Reduction with Maxillomandibular Fixation (MMF)

β€’ Indication: Non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures, patients with contraindications for surgery, or pediatric cases.

β€’ Technique: Application of arch bars, intermaxillary elastics, or Erich arch bars to maintain occlusion for 2–4 weeks.


Advantages:

β€’ Minimally invasive, avoiding surgical risks

β€’ Effective in stable fractures


Disadvantages:

β€’ Prolonged immobilization can lead to TMJ dysfunction or ankylosis

β€’ Patient discomfort, requiring dietary modification


3. Functional Treatment (Early Mobilization with Guiding Elastics)

β€’ Indication: Minimally displaced fractures, particularly in children or cooperative adults.

β€’ Technique: Uses guiding elastics or occlusal splints to assist in functional adaptation while allowing controlled motion.


Advantages:

β€’ Avoids rigid immobilization

β€’ Reduces risk of TMJ stiffness or ankylosis


Disadvantages:

β€’ Requires patient compliance

β€’ Not suitable for significantly displaced fractures


References:

1. Foster, C. M. B., & Chew, F. S. (2016). Fractures and dislocations of the face. In Broken Bones: The Radiologic Atlas of Fractures and Dislocations (pp. 318–339). Cambridge University Press.

2. Bayat, M., Parvin, M., & Meybodi, A. A. (2016). Mandibular subcondylar fractures: A review on treatment strategies. Electronic Physician, 8(10), 3144–3149

3. Oyer, S. L., & Boochoon, K. S. (2023). Treatment of subcondylar fractures of the mandible: A shifting paradigm. AAO-HNS Bulletin

4. Kuang, S.-J., He, Y.-Q., Zheng, Y.-H., & Zhang, Z.-G. (2019). Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures: A national inpatient sample analysis, 2005–2014. Medicine, 98(37), e16814

5. ChatGPT. 2025


#podcast #dentalpodcast #doctorgallagherpodcast #doctorgallagherspodcast #doctor #dentist #dentistry #oralsurgery #dental #dentalschool #dentalstudent #doctorlife #dentistlife #oralsurgeon #doctorgallagher

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us