Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Is Biohacking Bad? Ancestral Living Vs. Modern Science: Should We Return To Our Roots?

Is Biohacking Bad? Ancestral Living Vs. Modern Science: Should We Return To Our Roots?

Episode 1021 Published 7 years, 1 month ago
Description
My life is a little bit...strange.

As an immersive journalist, self-experimenter and self-professed “biohacker”, I do relatively unconventional things to upgrade my body and brain.

For example, I have this blood glucose monitor installed in my arm. It monitors my blood sugar 24-7. I wear a cognition-enhancing laser light helmet at work during the day, and stand naked in front of a giant red light panel while I’m replying to emails.

I give myself weekly IV’s full of a cocktail of special vitamins. I’ve also had the fat sucked from my back and the marrow from my bones to concentrate my own stem cells, and had surgery to have these cells placed into every joint of my body and mainlined into my bloodstream. I have tens of thousands of dollars of advanced medical technologies housed in my basement. You get the idea. I’m not normal.

But as a man who spends much of my life immersed in the modern health and longevity movement, attending anti-aging conferences and researching all the newfangled things people are doing these days to upgrade their bodies, I often survey the landscape of fringe supplements, biohacks, and anti-aging technologies and wonder…

...would our ancestors laugh at us? When it comes to living a long and healthy life, would their ancestral wisdom beat our modern science, hands down? After all, despite our modern infatuation with longevity and optimized bodies and brains, we are not strikingly healthier or longer-living than previous generations. In today's podcast, adapted from my recent TedX Coeur D' Alene Talk, I'll tackle this topic in detail.

You'll discover: -Why modern medicine, for all its marvels, may not be all it's cracked up to be...4:10
  • CDC reports life expectancy has dropped 3 consecutive years.
  • It's a false assertion to assume we'll live significantly longer than previous generations
  • "Life expectancy" is calculated by insurance, mutual fund companies as number of years after retirement, not after birth.
  • We would be seeing many more 100+ year olds; not the case
  • We have a better chance of surviving childhood (disease, etc.) but not necessarily living longer.
  • Our ancestors didn't always live nasty, brutish, short lives
-Popular current fads to extend human lifespan...7:43
  •  Vampire therapy, parabiosis (young blood)
    • Ancient Greeks considered to blood a magic elixir
    • Pliny the Elder, Homer, wrote about the healing efficacy of others' blood
    • GDF11, a primary anti-aging proteins activated by young blood transfusion, is increased by oxytocin
  • Stem cells
  • Cryopreservation
    • Modern day mummification
  •  Metformin
    • slightly modified version of a compound that was discovered in the French lilac plant (goat's rue)
    • Wired Magazine: Forget the Blood of Teens
    • Adverse side effects:
      • Lactic acidosis
      • Mitochondrial disruption
      • Vitamin B12 deficiency
      • Increase risk for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's
    • Natural alternatives:
      • Bitters, herbs, wild plants, bitter melon
Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us