Episode Details

Rand Paul Review’s Kurt Wallace interviewed podcast sensation Monica Perez about the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic final report, released on Dec. 2.

A central topic of the interview focused on whether or not COVID was intentionally released as a bio-weapon and if the vaccines were used to spread the disease rather than retard it.

Check out Rand Paul Review’s latest Christmas Deal! 25% off. FOREVER!

Though the 520-page report, titled “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Lessons Learned and a Path Forward,” doesn’t directly delve into the intentionality of the COVID pandemic, it does show that the weaponized virus “most likely emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.”

The conclusion that the virus was not natural and so necessarily came out of a lab was based on a synthesis of these five arguments:

* The virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.

* Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans. This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.

* Wuhan is home to China’s foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research at inadequate biosafety levels.

* Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researchers were sick with a COVID-like virus in the fall of 2019, months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.

* By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced.

Unless the virus was injected into the human population by aliens from outer space, it came out of the Wuhan lab. Why? Because all the evidence points to that fact.

But we already knew that.

Here’s another fact: Dr. Fauci and crew made a concerted effort to demonize the lab leak theory as a “conspiracy theory”–though Fauci’s National Institutes of Health helped fund the experiments at Wuhan–opened the door to speculation concerning not only the origins but the intended purpose of the weaponized virus.

Perez, who has a talent for “pulling back the curtain” on propaganda, provides a reasonable theory that not only was COVID-19 intentionally let loose on the world but that the vaccines introduced in the thick of the pandemic were designed to spread the virus, not stop it.

Why on earth would anyone intentionally unleash a deadly virus on the world and then work to spread it? To cull the human herd. A virus would be a lot less trouble than a war to get rid of people. If the virus was engineered to target the weak and vulnerable, so much the better.

If that sounds like a Saturday late-night black-and-white science fiction movie rerun, you need to get up in the morning and start watching the news.

It is beyond doubt that Fauci and his minions did their best to run a misinformation campaign and suppress criticism about their handling of the pandemic. In one example, the Great Barrington Declaration–co-sponsored by President-elect Trump’s new NIH pick Dr. Jay Battacharya–was signed by scientists and medical doctors from around the world, including Nobel laureates. That didn't stop Fauci and his side-kick

Listen Now