Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Is “observability” just “instrumentation”? Or, monitoring sucks? No, you suck.

Is “observability” just “instrumentation”? Or, monitoring sucks? No, you suck.

Episode 106 Published 9 years ago
Description

The DevOps kids have decided to come up with a new term “observability.” We get to the bottom of the WTF barrel on what that is - it sounds like a good word-project. Also, there’s a spate of kubernetes news, as always, and some interesting acquisitions. Plus, a micro-iOS 11 review.

Meta, follow-up, etc.
  • Patreon - like anyone who starts these things, I have no idea WTF it is, if it’s a good idea, or if I should be ashamed. Need some product/market fit.
  • Check out the Software Defined Talk Members Only White-Paper Exiguous podcast over there.
  • Join us all in the SDT Slack.
Is “observability” just “instrumentation”?
  • Write-up from Cindy Sridharan.
  • This guy: “Thinking directionally, Monitoring is the passive collection of Metrics, logs, etc. about a system, while Observability is the active dissemination of information from the system. Looking at it another way, from the external ‘supervisor’ perspective, I monitor you, but you make yourself Observable.”
  • So, yes: if developers actually make their code monitorable and manageable…easy street! It’s a good detailing of that important part of DevOps.
  • Cloud Native Java has a good example with the default “observability” attributes for apps, and then an overview of Zipkin tracing.
Weekly k8s News