Episode Details
Back to EpisodesWhiteboard Confessional: The Rise and Fall of the T-Shaped Engineer
Description
About Corey Quinn
Over the course of my career, I’ve worn many different hats in the tech world: systems administrator, systems engineer, director of technical operations, and director of DevOps, to name a few. Today, I’m a cloud economist at The Duckbill Group, the author of the weekly Last Week in AWS newsletter, and the host of two podcasts: Screaming in the Cloud and, you guessed it, AWS Morning Brief, which you’re about to listen to.
Links
Transcript
Corey Quinn: Welcome to AWS Morning Brief: Whiteboard Confessional. I’m Cloud Economist Corey Quinn. This weekly show exposes the semi-polite lie that is whiteboard architecture diagrams. You see, a child can draw a whiteboard architecture, but the real world is a mess. We discuss the hilariously bad decisions that make it into shipping products, the unfortunate hacks the real-world forces us to build, and that the best to call your staging environment is “theory”. Because invariably whatever you’ve built works in the theory, but not in production. Let’s get to it.
On this show, I talk an awful lot about architectural patterns that are horrifying. Let’s instead talk for a moment about something that isn’t horrifying. CHAOSSEARCH. Architecturally, they do things right. They provide a log analytics solution that separates out your storage from your compute. The data lives inside of your S3 buckets, and you can access it using APIs you’ve come to know and tolerate, through a series of containers that live next to that S3 storage. Rather than replicating massive clusters that you have to care and feed for yourself, instead, you now get to focus on just storing data, treating it like you normally would other S3 data and not replicating it, storing it on expensive disks in triplicate, and fundamentally not having to deal with the pains of running other log analytics infrastructure. Check them out today at CHAOSSEARCH.io.
For a long time now, I’ve been a believer in the idea of the T-shaped engineer. And what I mean by that is that you should be broad across a wide variety of technologies, but deep in one or two very specific areas. So, it looks a bit like a T, or an inverted T, depending upon how you wind up visualizing that. I’m describing this with words. I don’t have a whiteboard in front of me. Use your imagination, you’ll be okay. The point being is that whenever you’re working in a new environment, or on a new problem, having a broad base of technologies of which you’re aware, is incredibly useful to fall back upon. Now, the reason to be super deep in one or two areas, is that specialization is generally what lets people charge more for various services. People want to hire domain-specific expertise for an awful lot of problems that they want to get solved. So, having something that you can bring into job interviews and more or less mop the floor with people asking questions around that domain is an incredibly valuable thing to have.
But that has some other consequences too