Episode Details
Back to Episodes
Week 5: Our Motivation and Commitment is Mission Driven
Description
Happy Friday!
As we wrap up this week, I want to sincerely thank everyone for all of your hard work and the sacrifices you’ve made. Your dedication to our students and our school community does not go unnoticed, and it is because of each of you that we continue to make strides in all areas.
In this week’s Wrap-up, I want to take a moment to reflect on what drives us. Our motivations are the foundation of the commitment we bring to our roles each day. Also, I will highlight some of the changes in professional development for Arkansas educators, and make you aware of new opportunities for non-licensed employees to earn their teaching degree and license.
Commitment and Motivation
I want to take a moment to reflect on the motivations that drive our work and the types of commitment we bring to the school. Three key types of commitment influence how we engage with our roles: affective, continuance, and normative commitment.
* Affective Commitment: This is when we are driven by a deep emotional attachment to our work because we truly believe in the mission of our school and what it stands for. It is the “want to” feeling – we are here because we want to make a difference in the lives of our students and contribute to something meaningful.
* Continuance Commitment: This type of commitment is more pragmatic. It is when we stay because leaving would come at too high a cost, whether that is financial, professional, or personal. It is the “have to” feeling – we might not be passionate about everything we do, but the stakes of walking away are too high.
* Normative Commitment: This stems from a sense of obligation. We stay because we feel that we should. It is the “ought to” feeling – perhaps we owe it to our colleagues, our students, or even ourselves to see things through, regardless of personal preference.
Beyond these forms of commitment, we also have two primary motivators that affect how we approach our work: mission-driven or ego-driven.
* Mission-driven motivation comes from a focus on the greater good. It is about serving our students, supporting each other, and striving for excellence because we believe in the collective success of our school.
* Ego-driven motivation, on the other hand, is more focused on individual gain, recognition, or advancement.
While both motivations can drive success, it is the mission-driven schools that see long-lasting impact and sustained success. When we are aligned with our school's mission, we cultivate affective commitment—the kind of dedication that sustains us through challenges because we believe in the value and purpose of our work. This idea mirrors what Simon Sinek describes in his book Start With Why, where he explains that “People don’t buy what you do; they buy why you do it, and what you do simply proves what you believe.” When our "why" is deeply rooted in the school’s mission and the difference we want to make in students' lives, our actions become more meaningful.
Sinek emphasizes that mission-driven organizations foster a culture of intrinsic motivation and loyalty, which leads to higher performance and a lasting legacy. Schools that prioritize their "why"—their core mission to educate and empower—are more likely to inspire not only teachers and staff but also students and the community to achieve greatness.
This sense of shared purpose also ties into social identity theory in social psychology. People tend to derive a strong sense of belonging and self-esteem when they identify with the mission and values of the group they are part of. In our case, when staff m