Episode Details

Back to Episodes
Lawfare Daily: What the Immunity Decision Says About Proving the Case Against Trump

Lawfare Daily: What the Immunity Decision Says About Proving the Case Against Trump

Published 1 year, 8 months ago
Description
Lawfare Executive Editor Natalie Orpett sat down with Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes and Legal Fellow Anna Bower to discuss their recent Lawfare article, “What’s Going On in Footnote 3?” The article looks at a very specific issue buried in the Supreme Court's recent decision in Trump v. United States, or “the presidential immunity case”: what evidence the prosecution can use—and what it can't—to prove its case. Natalie, Ben, and Anna talked about what footnote 3 says, the many questions it raises, and what it all means for the future of Special Counsel Jack Smith's Jan. 6 case against Donald Trump. 

Get for Ad Free Podcasts

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Listen Now

Love PodBriefly?

If you like Podbriefly.com, please consider donating to support the ongoing development.

Support Us