Episode Details

Polarized Training is a hot topic of conversation and has been a central part of recent criticism toward TrainerRoad’s training plans. In this episode, we cover the basics of endurance training, go in-depth into the ten studies that have been used to criticize TrainerRoad, comprehensively review the current Polarized Training research, and take a deeper look at how TrainerRoad’s training plans are structured, then address the most common questions about them.

------------------------------------------------------------------

TOPICS COVERED IN THIS EPISODE

- Intro 0:00

- How to Critically Analyze Scientific Research 9:53

- The Basics of Endurance Training and Periodization 15:00

- What is Training Intensity Distribution? 19:30

- What is Polarized Training and How Is It Measured? 25:22

- What Are the Five Main Training Intensity Distribution Models? 29:51

- Can You Compare Sweet Spot vs. Polarized? 33:49

- What Does the Current Research Say About Polarized Training? 37:04

- Adaptive Training and New TrainerRoad Training Plans 1:26:53

- Who Should Do Sweet Spot Base High Volume 1:29:44

- Adaptive Training Closed Beta Update 1:33:00

------------------------------------------------------------------

STUDIES MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE (In order of appearance and discussion)

- Six weeks of a polarized training-intensity distribution leads to greater physiological and performance adaptations than a threshold model in trained cyclists. Neal et al, 2013. - 37:18

- Does Polarized Training Improve Performance in Recreation Runners. Munoz et al, 2014. - 58:59

- Training-Intensity Distribution During an Ironman Season: Relationship With Competition Performance. Munoz et al, 2013.